Understanding Critical Design Tensions With Progression Through Historical Practices

I'm excited to see my latest article "Understanding Critical Design Tensions With Progression Through Historical Practices" just published by DIID Disegno industriale / industrial design journal.
More than an article, this is a disciplinary conversation around critical design that builds on James Pierce framework of 'tension with progression'. Here I suggest that understanding these practices needs reflections on how these are situated within specific historical as well as geographical contexts and that all in all, critical design does not necessarily resist production, but specific forms of it.